Born Again According To Abundant Mercy

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His abundant mercy has begotten us again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, (1 Peter 1:3)

We have just started going through 1 Peter in the men’s bible study. I only have a couple of commentaries at my disposal on this magnificent epistle, so it is encouraging me to be more dependent on praying and meditating on the text – there is certainly a sweetness to this that I had been neglecting up until recently. That being said, I did find something in Calvin’s commentary on the first letter of Peter that is worded quite well.

Commenting on 1 Peter 1:3:

According to his abundant mercy. He first mentions the efficient cause, and then he points out the mediating cause, as they say. He shews that God was induced by no merits of ours to regenerate us unto a living hope, because he assigns this wholly to his mercy. But that he might more completely reduce the merits of works to nothing, he says, great (multam) mercy. All, indeed, confess that God is the only author of our salvation, but they afterwards invent extraneous causes, which take away so much from his mercy. But Peter commends mercy alone; and he immediately connects the way or manner, by the resurrection of Christ; for God does not in any other way discover his mercy; hence Scripture ever directs our attention to this point. And that Christ’s death is not mentioned, but his resurrection, involves no inconsistency, for it is included; because a thing cannot be completed without having a beginning; and he especially brought forward the resurrection, because he was speaking of a new life.

Calvin explains why Peter is driving home, According to His abundant mercy. It is because he wants to get it through our heads that we are not born again because we believe but that we believe because we are born again and we are born again according to the abundant mercy of God.

1 Peter on Peter

1Pe 1:3-9  Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His abundant mercy has begotten us again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,  (4)  to an inheritance incorruptible and undefiled and that does not fade away, reserved in heaven for you,  (5)  who are kept by the power of God through faith for salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.  (6)  In this you greatly rejoice, though now for a little while, if need be, you have been grieved by various trials,  (7)  that the genuineness of your faith, being much more precious than gold that perishes, though it is tested by fire, may be found to praise, honor, and glory at the revelation of Jesus Christ,  (8)  whom having not seen you love. Though now you do not see Him, yet believing, you rejoice with joy inexpressible and full of glory,  (9)  receiving the end of your faith—the salvation of your souls. (NKJV)

The above was the text for our second men’s group meeting on the book of 1 Peter. Delving into this passage, we found a fairly strong hint that Peter was probably thinking about his own experience with trials, how he had failed, but his faith did not. We kept in close view the passage about Peter’s denial of Christ in Luke. Notice in the passage below that after the Lord had told Peter his faith would not fail, He tells him, ‘when you have returned to Me.’ You may well ask, ‘Why is that important?’ It is important because Jesus told him ‘when’ and not ‘if.’ Peter’s faith was in the hands of God. We may fail in our trials and temptations, but our faith will not if it comes from God.

Luk 22:31-34  And the Lord said, “Simon, Simon! Indeed, Satan has asked for you, that he may sift you as wheat.  (32)  But I have prayed for you, that your faith should not fail; and when you have returned to Me, strengthen your brethren.”  (33)  But he said to Him, “Lord, I am ready to go with You, both to prison and to death.”  (34)  Then He said, “I tell you, Peter, the rooster shall not crow this day before you will deny three times that you know Me.” (NKJV)

Just to throw this in, I made the point in our group that too many times men who would serve in their church are restricted from service due to sin in their past, even sins committed while they were Christians. This however is a terrible wrong to the body of Christ. Men whom God have restored, should not be thrown aside as the refuse of the Christian faith by ‘well-meaning’ church leaders. To disqualify people because of sin – sin which has been repented of – would disqualify every last one of us. Saying all of this, I understand that time will tell if someone has truly repented and God will put His people where He wants them when He wants them there. So I offer this question for thought: “When Paul is giving the qualifications for deacons and elders in 1 Timothy, is he basing these qualifications on who they were, or who they are now?”

Alexander Nisbet?

1 & 2 Peter, Geneva Commentary Series

I am starting a men’s bible study on I & II Peter within a week. When I start a bible study, I like to get a taste of perspectives from more than one century (i.e. not just my own) on commentaries that I use. I have been searching for a puritan commentary and I have been interested in one by Alexander Nisbet, but I don’t know about him at all and am having trouble getting any info on him.

Does anyone know anything about him or at least the quality of his commentary on I & II Peter? Any help or links would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!